{"schema_version":1,"from_cycle":"2026-10-01","to_cycle":"2026-10-29","airport":"3M5","counts":{"action":1,"ifr":0,"fyi":2},"changes":[{"id":"3e1d1fb140cd","priority":"action","category":"runway","kind":"changed","summary":"runway 09/27: length: 2180 -> 2551 ft","source":"APT_RWY","fields":[{"field":"RWY_LEN","old":"2180","new":"2551"}]},{"id":"7290d5192082","priority":"fyi","category":"airport","kind":"changed","summary":"airport owner address: P.O. BOX 24 -> PO BOX 24; airport owner zip+4: none -> 0024","source":"APT_CON","fields":[{"field":"ADDRESS1","old":"P.O. BOX 24","new":"PO BOX 24"},{"field":"ZIP_PLUS_FOUR","old":"","new":"0024"}]},{"id":"3823a22be73a","priority":"fyi","category":"remark","kind":"added","summary":"new runway 09/27 length remark: the changes submitted are adjustments to both the physical runway length and runway center endpoint locations as delineated by long standing Low Intensity Runway Lights marking the ends of the prepared runway surface. in addition, there is a Displaced runway threshold of 350 foot for runway 27, also marked with long standing Low Intensity Runway Lights the current data in the airport record does not reflect this other than apparently using it to calculate the currently published length of both runway 9 and 27. the Displaced runway threshold is present due to a roadway elevated above runway elevation that runs perpendicular to the runway on the approach end of runway 27. we would request that the Displaced runway threshold be reflected in the ADM data.","source":"APT_RMK","original":"THE CHANGES SUBMITTED ARE ADJUSTMENTS TO BOTH THE PHYS RWY LEN AND RWY CNTR ENDPOINT LOCATIONS AS DELINEATED BY LONG STANDING LIRL MRKG THE ENDS OF THE PREPARED RWY SFC.  IN ADDN, THERE  IS A DTHR OF 350 FT FOR RWY 27, ALSO MKD WITH LONG STANDING LIRL   THE CURRENT DATA IN THE ARPT RCRD DOES NOT REFLECT THIS  OTR THAN APPARENTLY USING IT TO CALCULATE THE CURRENTLY PUBLISHED LEN OF BOTH RWY 9 AND 27.  THE DTHR IS PRESENT DUE TO A ROADWAY ELEVATED ABV RWY ELEV THAT RUNS PERPENDICULAR TO THE RWY ON THE APCH END OF RWY 27.  WE WOULD REQ THAT THE DTHR BE REFLECTED IN THE ADM DATA."}]}